CFA二级数量题目分享significant variable estimate(s)
Determine, using only the statistically significant variable estimate(s) in Logistic Regression 2 and the information provided below, which of the following is closest to the probability of the Alpha ETF being a winning fund and whether it would be classified as a winning fund.
Alpha ETF variable values:
■ small_fund = 0.
■ medium_fund = 0.
■ portfolio_stocks = 99.3%.
■ portfolio_bonds = 0.7%.
■ price_earnings = 25.0.
■ price_book =1.1.
■ price_sales = 4.0.
■ price_cashflow = 5.7.
Use a significance level of 5% and a probability threshold for being a winner of 65%.
A 27.4%, and the Alpha ETF is not classified as a winning fund
B 36.0%, and the Alpha ETF is not classified as a winning fund
C 82.2%, and the Alpha ETF is classified as a winning fund
解析:
B is correct. Besides the significant intercept, the only significant (at the 5% level) variable in Logistic Regression 2 is price_sales. Using these two factors, the probability of this ETF being a winning fund is calculated to be 35.95%, as follows:
Because this probability is well below the 65% threshold for being a winner, the Alpha ETF would not be classified as a winning fund.
阅读排行
-
1
重磅利好!CFA入选国家紧缺清单,含金量暴涨的背后意味着什么?
-
2
重磅发布丨CFA被纳入《北京市国际职业资格认可目录(2025年版)》急需紧缺国际职业资格清单
-
3
CFA备考教材怎么选?官方教材vs notes对比,看完这篇就懂了!
-
4
CFA证书含金量怎么样,CFA证书价值有哪些?
-
5
CFA考前3个月心态崩了?如何科学调整并稳住复习节奏
-
6
CFA证书对从事金融行业有哪些助力?
-
7
CFA证书和FRM证书选择哪个?
-
8
CFA证书在不同城市可以享受到的福利政策有哪些?
-
9
考后必看!2025年8月CFA考试成绩发布日期&焦虑等待全攻略
-
10
拿下CFA证书有哪些工作机会?